List Price: $29.98Amazon.com's Price: $24.99 You Save: $4.99 (17%)as of 11/21/2009 11:45 EST
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping.
Aspect Ratio: 1.77:1
Audience Rating: Unrated
Binding: DVD
Brand: KOCH ENT.
EAN: 0741952653493
Feature: Combining the excitement of contemporary crime drama with actual historical events, this graphic, fivepart series follows magistrate and author Henry Fielding (Ian McDiarmid) and his blind half brother John (Iain Glen) on their quest to clean up the streets of 18th century London amidst a population of prostitutes, pimps, gangs and villains. Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: TELEVISION Rating:&
Format: Color, Dolby, DVD, Widescreen, NTSC
Item Dimensions: 100
Label: Koch Vision
Languages: EnglishOriginal Language
Manufacturer: Koch Vision
MPN: KOC-DV6534
Number Of Items: 2
Publisher: Koch Vision
Region Code: 1
Release Date: June 10, 2008
Running Time: 235 minutes
Studio: Koch Vision
Theatrical Release Date: 2007
Features:- Combining the excitement of contemporary crime drama with actual historical events, this graphic, fivepart series follows magistrate and author Henry Fielding (Ian McDiarmid) and his blind half brother John (Iain Glen) on their quest to clean up the streets of 18th century London amidst a population of prostitutes, pimps, gangs and villains. Format: DVD MOVIE Genre: TELEVISION Rating:&
Related Items:
Browse for similar items by category: Click to Display
Editorial Review:
Product Description:
Combining the excitement of contemporary crime drama with actual historical events this graphic fivepart series follows magistrate and author Henry Fielding (Ian McDiarmid) and his blind half brother John (Iain Glen) on their quest to clean up the streets of 18th century London amidst a population of prostitutes pimps gangs and villains.System Requirements:Running Time: 300 minutesFormat: DVD MOVIE Genre: TELEVISION/TALK SHOW Rating: NR UPC: 741952653493 Manufacturer No: KOC-DV6534
Average Rating: 
Rating:  -
Well researched, well acted and well staged, without sacrifice to modern correctness or language - yes, this is the other side of the coin, and the language then was rough, as was the life for many, but people still poured into London by the thousands every year from the countryside seeking work, opportunity, fame, or just anonymity. There was nothing anywhere like London and it was seductive. During this period London's population stayed static despite the constant in-migration from the countryside, because the city consumed people like a monster: crime, overcrowding, bad food, gin - it's all here: The staging claustrophobic, shadowy and very real, the mapping innovative, the camera work nuanced and almost speaking, the fight scenes convincing. There's a great deal of humour in this series, as well, some of it very gallows, but that was another feature of the 18th century - a sense of black, ironic humour which may even seem a little callous to us today. The viewer sees how really rough the brothers had it during a time when you could get held up in Hyde Park at high noon by a highwayman, with little help but a few fellow crusaders like Saunders Welch. Henry alone, and then later (which this series depicts) with his younger half-brother John, fought 12-16 hours a day to keep the peace and to somehow, some way, put a stop to the Hydra-headed monster called crime that was devouring London. All in the face of deep distrust of anything resembling a standing police force from the mob and the aristocracy alike. The Brothers Fielding's efforts were paid from secret service money.
Here is where it all began, drawn from contemporary records (the Bow Court records) with a good job done even in small details. The series is worth watching more than once not only for pleasure, but to catch some of the subtleties.
Ian McDiarmid is older than the Fielding he plays, who died at 47, but he really captures the spirit of the man so well, his humour and his rough tongue, his passion and that awful gout - it could hardly be better! Even the way he guzzles rather than sipping his wine - Fielding could take down 3 bottles of port in an evening - with almost palpable pleasure. I feel John is also played quite well by Iain Glen, with a very haunting and really quite creepy questioning of a gang member in one of the latter episodes. This includes portraying the struggles the brothers first had working together until they could come to an understanding and a system - in his early 30s at this time, John was an ex-military man (he had had his eyes injured at 19 in the Navy, and later went blind by the 'ministrations' of a supposed noted London eye surgeon. He didn't have a barrister brother for nothing; Henry sued for £400-500); and like his brother, brilliant, if less wild. Although John looked up to and admired Henry, and Henry loved "dear Jack", their distinct and at times contradictory personalities were bound to clash under the constant pressure.
This is styled as a police drama - it is in a way a fictionalized account of a factual occurrence, based on solid historical research with the Fielding brothers working as detectives; something which, as noted in Hue and Cry (Patrick Pringle) actually did happen. In fact, John Fielding was a predecessor of Sherlock Holmes in implementing deductive reasoning in investigation. Henry did similarly in his close questioning and investigation, with subsequent recording, of various cases. Very unfortunately, much was lost when the Lord Gordon rioters torched Sir John Fielding's house in the 1780s, burning many of Henry Fielding's papers and notes, so in fact it is very difficult to recreate the exact methods of detection and interrogation.
The molly houses, the taverns, the dirt, the foul language and, yes, the mores, are all here and distinctly 18th century. I have only two bones to pick with the production - one is WHERE IS SEASON 2?? The other is, that leonine mane of hair John Fielding sported was not a wig - it was his own hair.
Notes to US viewers:
1. This is not a dramatization of the excellent Sir John Fielding novels. It is the story of the inception of the Bow Street Runners.
2. This is not a Hollywood production.
Rating:  -
For those who were expecting Bruce Alexanders books to be faithfully represented on video, I only have 3 words for you don't buy this. The story lines were full of characters not in the books, sexual story lines not in the books etc. My advice is to stay with the books, a much more enjoyable way to spend an hour or two living in old London Town.
Rating:  -
TV series City of Vice has a great true-life pitch - the efforts of brothers Henry and John Fielding (the author of Tom Jones and a celebrated blind magistrate, played by Ian McDiarmid and Iain Glen respectively) to form England's first police force amid the squalor and near-apocalyptic lawlessness of a London already bursting at the seams in 1753. With the massive growth of cities (especially London) and a nationwide addiction to gin that makes modern problems with drugs look almost quaint, the 17-18th century was perhaps the most violent era in British history (though, despite dealing with murder, child prostitution, rape and sundry perversions, the series is not nearly so violent), yet the brothers still faced hostility from an aristocracy who could afford private protection to what they saw as an instrument of tyranny more suited to foreigners than free Englishmen. While the show sometimes downplays the casual violence, the brothers' morality, though seen from a 20th century perspective, is distinctly 18th century - they are not above ruining the odd reputation or contriving a robbery on a recalcitrant would-be patron to secure the Bow Street Runners' future. Nor does it turn them into glowing examples of police work. They're an almost fumbling band of detectives - as the first in their field, they're unsure even of how to investigate a murder ("How is it done?" "Ask questions?") - and often they uphold the principle of the law with disastrous consequences to the victims of crimes.
The series too feels like it's still feeling its way along and doesn't always have the full confidence of its backers at Channel 4 - the metropolis a little underpopulated at times, the budgetary limitations apparent in the less-than-bustling streets and the nighttime hangings that fail to hide the lack of crowds. Yet often it manages to paper over the cracks with surprising style, using animated street maps of London to link scenes and adding scaffolding to sets they can't afford to build in their entirety to give an impression of a city at once sprouting up and falling down (literally in one scene of a slum collapsing, tenants and all). It's convincingly foul mouthed ("The Devil **** you, Mr Fielding!" is one of the more minor terms of abuse), with McDiarmid deserving special praise for his tireless efforts to restore the word `****ster' to the common modern-day vocabulary. Despite the grim material it's not without moments of wit - Henry's wife, a former maid, cannot help herself from doing the housework - and if it's at times overly reliant on narration to fill the audience in on details, at least it's genuinely informative. The formidable John Fielding's abilities sometimes tend to get short shrift - he tends to get typed as the stern, unyielding one - and some of the guest stars are surprisingly awkward - Juliet Aubrey's strange inflection and Gary Lewis' often inaudible insular distemperate delivery make the lack of subtitles particularly problematic, but despite its problems the six episodes are compelling and intriguing enough to leave you hoping for a more fully realised second series.
Rating: -
This purchase taught us a lesson - don't buy a DVD before you've seen at least one episode. After watching the first two hours, we gave up simply because we couldn't undersand much of the dialog. Some heavy accents, poor audio pick-up and constant background sound effects combined to make the dialog unintelligible about 30% of the time.
Too bad, because the video portrayed the seamy side of London very well.
Rating: -
I saw this series elsewhere and just had to add it to my collection. What this series managed to do was show the grubbiness and violence of the early 18th century and offer entertaining stories of the birth of English policing.
It certainly helps to know a little bit of both 1) the situation in London prior to the Fielding brothers and 2) the attitude of the English to the idea of a public police force.
In the years before this series was set the usual method of capturing criminals was to offer a reward. This was done by both the state and private individuals. Private individuals would then produce the criminals and/or the stolen goods in order to receive the reward. The upshot of this was the creation of a system where the people who caught the criminals were often hand in glove with the criminals. The thief takers would also manufacture evidence against innocent individuals if the true criminal could not be found or would give him a sufficiently large bribe. Jonathan Wilde,the self-styled "Thief-taker General of England and Ireland", was the most notorious of this fraternity. He was hanged in 1725 for his more criminal activities.
As for the attitude of the English toward a public police force, they didn't want one. An Englishman's home was his castle and he did not want to be forced to allow an outside force into his home. This attitude is very clear in the first episode and the third.
So the proposed course the Fielding brothers took in trying to track down criminals was very forward thinking and done in the teeth of quite a bit of opposition.
I think the depiction of the London underworld was very realistic. It's probably too gritty for the taste of some, and I admit to wincing at times, myself, but I could not fault the production for being anachronistic. There's brief but not gratuitous nudity. The lighting appears natural. A high quality television screen is needed to pick up the details.
I find the depiction of the homosexual life in London at the time very interesting. It brought to might Diana Gabaldon's Lord John and the Private Matter set a few years later in a similar milieu.
All in all an entertaining series and one that deserves a second season.
|
