List Price: $39.95You Pay Only: $23.49 You Save: $16.46 (41%)Prices subject to change.
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1
Audience Rating: Unrated
Binding: DVD
EAN: 0715515031028
Format: Color, Dolby, DVD-Video, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen
Label: Criterion Collection
Manufacturer: Criterion Collection
Number Of Items: 2
Publisher: Criterion Collection
Region Code: 1
Release Date: August 26, 2008
Running Time: 116 minutes
Sales Rank: 1145
Studio: Criterion Collection
Theatrical Release Date: 1975
Related Items:
Editorial Review:
Product Description:
Pier Paolo Pasolini s notorious final film, Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom, has been called nauseating, shocking, depraved, pornographic . . . it s also a masterpiece. The controversial poet, novelist, and filmmaker s transposition of the Marquis de Sade s 18th-century opus of torture and degradation to 1944 Fascist Italy remains one of the most passionately debated films of all time, a thought-provoking inquiry into the political, social, and sexual dynamics that define the world we live in.
SPECIAL EDITION DOUBLE-DISC SET FEATURES:
New, restored high-definition digital transfer
The End of Salò, a 40-minute documentary about the film s final scene
Salò: Yesterday and Today, a 35-minute documentary featuring interviews with Pier Paolo Pasolini, actor-filmmaker Jean-Claude Biette, and Pasolini s friend Nineto Davoli
Fade to Black, a new short documentary about Salò, featuring interviews with filmmakers Bernardo Bertolucci, Catherine Breillat, and John Maybury
New interviews with set designer Dante Ferretti and filmmaker/film scholar Jean-Pierre Gorin
Optional English-dubbed soundtrack
Theatrical trailer
Optional English subtitles
PLUS: A booklet featuring new essays by Neil Bartlett, Roberto Chiesi, Naomi Greene, Gary Indiana, and Sam Rohdie, and excerpts from Gideon Bachman s on-set diary
Customer Reviews
Average Rating: 
Rating:  - An Exercise in Endurance
If Pasolini made this film in order to disturb people, he certainly was successful. Salò is disturbing, but not necessarily shocking. It is certainly anti-erotic in the extreme for it is almost exclusively about power, and [...]. The four Fascist hosts (the duke, the president, the magistrate and the bishop) are so disgusting, but almost tedious in their perversions. I was more disturbed by the grotesque madams who share their lewd stories with a piano accompaniment.
Pasolini clearly had issues with sexuality as he seems portrays homosexuality as rape and child sexual abuse, a power trip in which decadent authoritarians play out their filthy fantasies with captive young boys as their play things. It seems to buy into the hystrical notion that homosexuality is equal to cross-dressers who revel in the most obscene sex acts and [...].
I'm not sure why I even wanted to watch this film. It's another film I found on a "most controversial movies" list and decided I had to watch, just because I could. I read a lot about it before I decided to view it and truthfully, it felt like an endurance test to pass so I could say I did it, but I never want to look back! It does need to be seen to believed, but it's not enjoyable and I feel a little less human after voluntarily watching it.
Rating:  - No more $1000 copies on Ebay since it's now back in print in a brand new special edition from Criterion!!!
No more megabuck copieson Ebay now since it's nowe reissued in a brand new 2 DVD set from Criterion!!! Yes,very shocking movie,much more than most horror films!!! NOT FOR THE KIDDIES OR PEOPLE w/ WEAK STOMACHS!!! The transfer of the film is superb,and the extras are first rate!!!
Rating:  - Heinous and evil...a sure candidate for sickest film ever.
I'm really tired of some people trying to defend this film as some sort of demented artistic statement about political dominance and moral depravity. There's nothing artistic about this at all. What this is is a film by an obviously mentally disturbed director (Pier Pasolini) who wanted to take out his inner anger about being oppressed for being homosexual, and he wanted to take it out on the general public at large. What can possibly be artistic about a film which shows a table full of adults and children eating human feces, vivid scalpings, genital burnings, continuous sodomy, organ mutilations, and teen children being lead around naked on leashes and forced to bark and eat scraps of food from a dog dish ??? THIS is supposed to be art ??? Salo is nothing but pure evil. No other film is as brutally, vividly disturbing as this one. But that does NOT make it a work of art. Quite the opposite. It is the type of film that can make you be ashamed to be part of the human race. If you suffer from depression or are under any sort of treatment to overcome post-traumatic stress, I strongly urge you - DO NOT WATCH THIS FILM IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM !!! It will only make your condition worse. I know the film's reputation for being the sickest, most disturbing film ever will make you curious - as it did me - but trust me, if you watch it, you will wish you never had. I know I wish I never did. The images, once seen, are difficult to clear from one's mind (and they never completely do).
Read More
Rating:  - Absolute Darkness
"Salo or 120 Days of Sodom" (1975) by Pier Paolo Pasolini is the film the completely lives up to its reputation of one of or even THE most disturbing, depressing, cruel, and unwatchable ever made. I had to fast forward some of the scenes and turned from the screen during the others. It is not surprising because Pasolini had adapted to the screen the most notorious and IMO unreadable novel by Marquise De Sade and updated it from 18th Century France to 1944 Fascist's Italy to so called Republic of Salo where Mussolini had his last residence. I could not finish the novel. I stopped after 40 pages or so because it is not the novel really rather a catalog of disgusting. The main four characters have been introduced in the beginning as the fully developed monsters. Their victims just stayed that - the victims. There is no plot, no intrigue, and no development, just the endless loop of rapes, tortures, and murders. Yes, I understand that it is a satire and the absolute power corrupts absolutely but reading the book was a torture of boredom. As for Pasolini's work, I've loved and admired every one of his films I've seen before I decided to see Salo. Controversial, unpredictable, a true poet of cinema, his films are among my favorites, they talk to me like not many do. I finished watching "Salo or 120 Days of Sodom", all of it, including the tragic devastating final part, and I have not formed the final opinion on it. It is not the film to enjoy, it is a beautifully photographed by great Tonino Delli Colli, ... Read More
Rating: - Side of humanity one does not want to see
This surely is the masterpiece in a sense that I have not seen any work of art in the past like this one. It does not mean that it is pretty, or socially acceptable, or humane - on the contrary, film shows the sides of humanity one would rather choose to ignore or not know about altogether. We see four middle aged men along with the four middle aged women arrange for the time and place to exlore limits of human sexuality in the secluded italian castle. Considering troubling context of the movie, director places these events and its unfortunate protagonists in 1944-1945 period. It is end of the World War II, fascism is falling apart. Like most deaths, this sort of death raises strange reactions in people affected by it. Women I mentioned are engaged to be a storytellers (One of them is a musician), while men choose to engage in their desires that have no limits. I would say that film is divided into three parts: obsession, that leads to degradation and submission of the other human beings and finally masochism that ends in mass murder. There were moments when film was very difficult to watch. But like most totalitarian societies, this one finds its way to justify actions incomprehensible to most ordinary people.
Browse for similar items by category:
|
