Who do you think is the best overall player in the NFL. In my opinion it is Julius Peppers. Very talented athlete with a tremendous upside and great size and speed and he is still young. He will be one of the great sack artists, plus he makes the big play when his team needs it.

argualy, your right, but i will go out on a limb here and say manning is he oviously is Peyton manning, he broke dan marinos record and has had another great season, even though he cant beat that pats defense hes still the best

To me I think it's Ray Lewis. The reason is is cause he's a great leader and he can both tackle and cover. He's one of the only linebackers you don't want to go up against.

Why manning he's many a good passer but have you see the offense he got put any Qb in is situation you'll see he is not so impressive.
Julius Pepper nice choice . Ray Lewis great choice. Have you think about Troy Brown from New England Patriots WR/DB/Kr What an athlete he's my choice

Julius Peppers suks Manning great player but he is not my choice I say Teddy Brusky and Brett Favre

i think big ben is a great player but i have to ad mit teddy brusky brett favre and manning are also gtreat players

Do u even no who Big Ben is and if you do he is not better than Favre Big Ben is a rookie Brett Favre is a Vetern and hasnt not started for the packers in a regular season game for 13 years and has a Super Bowl ring and Teddy Bruski has 3 and Peyton Manning has the record for the most T.D. passes in the regular season .Big Ben is good but I bet u sopport the Steelers .In fact he is a backup qb and is a rookie I dont know why your on this forum u must know nothing about N.F.L

yes i do he is ben rouflusberger

you already know that

i know quite a bit actually

HOW MUCH THEN WHO DID THE PACKERS BEAT IN SUPER BOWL1 WITHOUT LOOKING IT UP IN ANYTHING

vikings i think

Julius Peppers fans, have you see this? Funny, funny, eBay freakjobs:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5200122033&rd=1&sspagename=STRK%3AMESE%3AIT&rd=1

The best player in the NFL isnt Peyton, cause he cant beat Tom, Peppers I cant complain about. Lets talk about Culpepper, hes young, strong, fast and hes got one hell of an arm. He threw for 39 touchdowns and only had 11 picks and throwing for over 4 thousand yards. If it wasnt for peyton Daunte would be the man so look out next season cause MY Vikings are working there way up the ladder.

Just cause brett Favre Is a Veteran and has a ring or 2 DOESNT make him the greatest football player, I hate the Steelers but Ben played 1 year of ball and did better than favre could do for the packers.I know Favre is good but hes out of gas and should retire. Aaron Rogers is your future and good luck with that

packers canot even play the viings, their in the same confrence, I nearly shat my pants when I say that, its ben roethlesburger

i agree culpepper is the best in the nfl hes younger then manning and alot more mobile now without moss and his luggage i think well see him shine even more

u should probably break this into defense and offense because u cant compare the 2

Culpepper is one year younger and although Culpepper is a great quarterback he along with everyone else is nowhere near as good as Manning is, Manning is head and shoulders the best quarterback in the leauge, people are already talking about Manning getting into the hall of fame and you dont hear that with Culpepper but he probobly will end up getting in

Thornton, The only Reason that you say Manning isnt better then brady is because brady has three superbowl rings and peyton doesnt, not taking anything away from brady but he is nowhere near as good as manning

nowhere as as good as manning? culpepper as followsYear Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yards YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate
1999 Minnesota Vikings 1 0 0 0 --- 0 --- 0 0 0 0/0 0 0 ---
2000 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 474 297 62.7 3937 8.31 78 33 16 34/181 56 13 98.0
2001 Minnesota Vikings 11 11 366 235 64.2 2612 7.14 57 14 13 33/186 34 5 83.3
2002 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 549 333 60.7 3853 7.02 61 18 23 47/244 48 9 75.3
2003 Minnesota Vikings 14 14 454 295 65.0 3479 7.66 59 25 11 37/196 41 10 96.4
2004 Minnesota Vikings 16 16 548 379 69.2 4717 8.61 82 39 11 46/238 63 18 110.9
TOTAL 74 73 2391 1539 64.4 18598 7.78 82 129 74 197/1045 242 55 93.2
manning as followsYear Team G GS Att Comp Pct Yards YPA Lg TD Int Tkld 20+ 40+ Rate
1998 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 575 326 56.7 3739 6.50 78 26 28 22/109 42 8 71.2
1999 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 533 331 62.1 4135 7.76 80 26 15 14/116 56 11 90.7
2000 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 571 357 62.5 4413 7.73 78 33 15 20/131 51 8 94.7
2001 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 547 343 62.7 4131 7.55 86 26 23 29/232 55 11 84.1
2002 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 591 392 66.3 4200 7.11 69 27 19 23/145 51 11 88.8
2003 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 566 379 67.0 4267 7.54 79 29 10 18/107 45 9 99.0
2004 Indianapolis Colts 16 16 497 336 67.6 4557 9.17 80 49 10 13/101 68 13 121.1
TOTAL 112 112 3880 2464 63.5 29442 7.59 86 216 120 139/941 368 71 92.3
have you even looked at the stats? i agree manning has a little better stats but cupepper doesnt choke near as much in the playoffs and he doesnt depend on an offensive line like manning plus manning hasnt had to put up with primadonnas like daunte has. and i also agree that brady is the best of the three in this league its rings that determins greatness not stats.

p.s. those are just passing stats if you want to compare rushing stats (which you dont) or sacks taken manning looks alot worse between the 2 and again culpeper is betten in the playoffs but neither one is better then bradyat least not untill they start winning some rings